Bibliographie
Agamben, Giorgio, “The Thing Itself”, in SubStance, Vol. 16, No. 2, Issue 53: Contemporary Italian Thought, 1987, pp. 18-28.
Bonnefoy, Yves and Naughton, John, “Readiness, Ripeness: Hamlet, Lear” , in New Literary History, Vol. 17, No. 3, Interpretations, 1986, pp. 477-491.
Bowers, Fredson, “The Structure of King Lear” , in Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1980, pp. 7-20.
Elam, Keir, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama, London and New York, Routledge, 2002. (1st ed. 1980)
Frye, Northrop, Fools of Time: Studies in Shakespearean Tragedy, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1967.
Fuko, Mišel, Hermeneutika subjekta, Trans. M. Kozić, B. Rakić, Novi Sad, Svetovi, 2003. (Serbian translation of L’Herméneutique du sujet).
Fuko, Mišel, Psihijatrijska moć, Trans. M. Kozić, Novi Sad, Svetovi, 2005. (Serbian translation of Le Pouvoir psychiatrique).
Jayne, Sears, “Charity in King Lear” , in Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1964, pp. 277-288.
McIntosh, Angus, “King Lear, Act I, Scene I. A Stylistic Note” , in The Review of English Studies, New Series, Vol. 14, No. 53, Feb., 1963, pp. 54-58.
Marshall, James, “A Critical Theory of the Self: Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Foucault” , in Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 20, 2001, pp. 75-91.
Napieralski, Edmund, “The Tragic Knot: Paradox in the Experience of Tragedy” , in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 31, No. 4, Summer 1973, pp. 441-449.
OED 2 on CD-ROM, v. 1.01, Oxford and Rotterdam: OUP and AND Software, 1992.
Pavlović, Miodrag, Poetika žrtvenog obreda, Beograd, Prosveta, 2000. (The Poetics of the Sacrificial Ritual, 1st ed. 1987).
Shakespeare, William, King Lear, Ed. Kenneth Muir, London and Massachusetts, Methuen and Harvard University Press, 1961.
Haut de page
Notes
Mišel Fuko, Hermeneutika subjekta, Novi Sad, Svetovi, 2003, p. 16.
Ibid., p. 17.
James Marshall, “A Critical Theory of the Self: Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, Foucault” , in Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 20, p. 83.
Ibid., p 83.
Keir Elam, The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama, London and New York, Routledge, 2002, p. 66.
Northrop Frye, Fools of Time: Studies in Shakspearean Tragedy, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1967, p. 97.
William Shakespeare, King Lear, London and Massachusetts, Methuen and Harvard University Press, 1961, p. 5, lines 1.1.37–41.
Miodrag Pavlović, Poetika žrtvenog obreda, Beograd, Prosveta, 2000, pp. 209-210.
Mišel Fuko, op. cit., p. 459.
Ibid., pp. 465-466, my italics.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., pp. 6-7, 1.1.53-61.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 9, 1.1.85-86.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 9, 1.1.91-93.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., pp. 10-11, 1.1.113-114.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 11, 1.1.120.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 10, 1.1.108.
Sears Jayne, “Charity in King Lear” , in Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Spring, 1964), p. 278.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 13, 1.1.145-148.
Angus McIntosh, “King Lear, Act I, Scene I. A Stylistic Note” , in The Review of English Studies, New Series, Vol. 14, No. 53 (Feb., 1963), p. 56, n. 1.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 19, 1.1.231-232.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 31, 1.2.120-121.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 37, 1.4.10-21.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 43, 1.4.136-137.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 43, 1.4.138-139.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 44, 1.4.167-171.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 122, 3.4.110-111.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 48, 1.4..234.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 48, 1.4.239.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 51, 1.4.277-280.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., pp. 51-52, 1.4.287-298.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p.83, 2.4.11-22.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 91, 2.4.147-149.
Mišel Fuko, Psihijatrijska moć, Novi Sad, Svetovi, 2005, pp. 35-36.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 98, 2.4.260-262.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., pp. 98-99, 2.4.269-288.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 107, 3.2.19-20.
Yves Bonnefoy and John T. Naughton, “Readiness, Ripeness: Hamlet, Lear” , in New Literary History, Vol. 17, No. 3, Interpretations (Spring, 1986), p. 489.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 110, 3.2.67-69.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 115, 3.4.28-36.
Fredson Bowers, “The Structure of King Lear” , in Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Spring, 1980), p. 12.
Mišel Fuko, Hermeneutika subjekta, p. 64.
Ibid., p. 68.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., pp. 147-148, 4.1.12-14.
Mišel Fuko, op. cit., pp. 144-145.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 116, 3.4.48-49.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 116, 3.4.50-55.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 122, 3.4.106-108.
Northrop Frye, op. cit., p. 107.
Giorgio Agamben, “The Thing Itself” , in SubStance, Vol. 16, No. 2, Issue 53: Contemporary Italian Thought (1987), p. 19.
Ibid., p. 19.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 122, 3.4.109.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 126, 3.4.158.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 127, 3.4.161.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 127, 3.4.180.
Edmund Napieralski, “The Tragic Knot: Paradox in the Experience of Tragedy”, in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Summer, 1973), p. 444.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 175, 4.6.96-97.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 178, 4.6. 135.
William Shakespeare, op. cit., p. 218, 5.3.307-308.
Northrop Frye, op. cit., p. 115.
Haut de page