Bibliographie
Arom, Simha, Nathalie Fernando, Susanne Fürniss, Sylvie Le Bomin, Fabrice Marandola, Emmanuelle Olivier, Hervé Rivière, Olivier Tourny. 2007. “Typologie des techniques polyphoniques.” In: Musiques: Une encyclopédie pour le XXIe siècle, tome 5: L’unité de la musique, edited by Jean-Jacques Nattiez, 1088–1109. Paris: Actes Sud / Cité de la Musique.
Blench, Roger. 2012. “Almost Everything You believed about the Austronesians isn’t True.” In: Crossing Borders: Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, vol. 1, edited by Mai Lin Tjoa-Bonatz, Andreas Reinecke, and Dominik Bonatz, 127–48. Singapore: NUS Press.
Blench, Roger. 2014. “The Patterns of Musical Practice in Melanesia: Can this be Tied to Linguistic Affiliation?” Paper presented at the Workshop on the Languages of Papua 3, Manokwari, West Papua, Indonesia, 20–24 January. Available at
http://www.rogerblench.info/Ethnomusicology/Papers/Pacific/Papuan%20music%20paper.pdf
Geurtjens, H. 1921. Uit een vreemde wereld, of het leven en streven der Inlanders op de Kei-Eilanden. ’s-Hertogenbosch: Teulings’ Uitgevers.
Goldsworthy, David J. 1979. “Melayu Music of North Sumatra: Continuities and Change.” Ph.D. dissertation. Monash University.
Kartomi, Margaret. 1994. “Is Maluku Still Musicological Terra Incognita? An Overview of the Music-Cultures of the Province of Maluku.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 25 (1): 141–71.
Kartomi, Margaret. 2012. Musical journeys in Sumatra. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Kaufman, Nikolaj. 1967. “Bŭlgarska narodna muzika: mnogoglasno narodno peene.” In Entsiklopediya na bŭlgarskata muzikalna kultura, edited by Petko Stainov, Venelin Krŭstev, and Raina Katsarova, 39–43. Sofia: Bulgarskata Akademiya na Naukite.
Kunst, Jaap. 1939. Music in Nias. (Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie, 38.) Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Kunst, Jaap. 1942. Music in Flores: A Study of the Vocal and Instrumental Music among the Tribes Living in Flores. (Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie 42, supplement.) Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Kunst, Jaap. 1960 [1954]. Cultural Relations between the Balkans and Indonesia. 2nd edn, enlarged. (Mededeling 107, Afdeling Culturele en Physische Anthropologie 47.) Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute [Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen].
Maceda, José. 1986. “A Concept of Time in a Music of Southeast Asia (a Preliminary Account).” Ethnomusicology 30 (1): 11–53.
Maceda, José. 1998. Gongs & bamboo: A panorama of Philippine Musical Instruments. Diliman, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Mallinckrodt, J. 1925. “Ethnografische mededeelingen over de Dajaks in de afdeeling Koealakapoeas (Res. Zuider- en Oosterafd. van Borneo” [Part 4]. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië 81: 165–310.
McLean, Mervyn. 1979. “Towards the Differentiation of Music Areas in Oceania.” Anthropos 74 (5/6): 717–36.
McLean, Mervyn. 1994. Diffusion of Musical Instruments and their Relation to Language Migrations in New Guinea. Kulele: Occasional Papers on Pacific Music and Dance, 1. Boroko, Papua New Guinea: Cultural Studies Division, The National Research Institute.
McLean, Mervyn. 2014. Music, Lapita, and the Problem of Polynesian Origins. Auckland, NZ: The author. http://polynesianorigins.org/download/McLean_MS_2014.pdf
Messner, Gerald Florian. 1981. “The Two-Part Vocal Style on Baluan Island, Manus Province, Papua New Guinea.” Ethnomusicology 25 (3): 433–46.
Nettl, Bruno. 1957. “The Hymns of the Amish: an Example of Marginal Survival.” Journal of American Folklore 70 (278): 323–28.
Patton, Marlene M. 1987. “Traditional Music in South Nias, Indonesia with Emphasis upon ‘Hoho’: Voices of the Ancestors.” M.A. thesis. University of Hawaii. UMI # 1333128.
Pigeaud, Th. 1938. Javaanse volksvertoningen: Bijdrage tot de beschrijving van land en volk. Batavia: Volkslectuur.
Rappoport, Dana. 2000. Musiques rituelles des Toraja Sa’dan: Musiques du couchant, musiques du levant (Célèbes-Sud, Indonésie). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Rappoport, Dana. 2010. “L’énigme des duos alternés à Flores et Solor (Lamaholot, Indonésie).” Archipel 79: 215–56.
Rappoport, Dana. 2011. “The Enigma of Alternating Duets in Flores and Solor (Eastern Indonesia).” In: Tradition, Identity and History-Making in Eastern Indonesia, edited by Hans Hägerdal, 130–48. Växjö, Kalmar, Sweden: Linnaeus University Press.
Rappoport, Dana. 2013. “Space and time in Indonesian polymusic.” Archipel 86: 9–42.
Rappoport, Dana. 2015. “Music as Evidence of Settlement: the Case of Diphonic Singing in Eastern Indonesia (Eastern Flores, Eastern Timor).” In: Language Documentation and Cultural Practices in the Austronesian World: Papers from 12-ICAL, Volume 4, edited by Wayan Arka et al., 135–148. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.
Revel, Nicole. 2013. “Gong Ensembles and Rituals around South China Sea.” Musika Jornal [Center for Ethnomusicology, University of the Philippines] 9: 2–48.
Rice, Timothy. 1977. “Polyphony in Bulgarian Folk Music.” Ph.D. dissertation. Seattle: University of Washington.
Schnitger, F. M. 1939. Forgotten Kingdoms in Sumatra. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Supanggah, Rahayu. 2011. Bothèkan – garap karawitan: The Rich styles of Interpretation in Javanese Gamelan Music, Book 1 & 2. Translated from Indonesian by Janet Purwanto. Surakarta: ISI Press Surakarta in collaboration with Garasi Seni Benawa Surakarta.
Weiss, Sarah. 2007. Listening to an Earlier Java: Aesthetics, Gender, and the Music of wayang in Central Java. (Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 237.) Leiden: KITLV Press.
Yampolsky, Philip. 2001a. “Indonesia, I: General, 1: Cultural and Musical Geography.” In The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd edition, edited by Stanley Sadie, 12: 274–83. London: Macmillan.
Yampolsky, Philip. 2001b. “Can the Traditional Arts Survive, and should They?” Indonesia [Cornell] 71: 175–85.
DISCOGRAPHY
Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) and Timor-Leste (TL)
Timor
T1. Tata-hateke ba dok: Timor. CD. Tradisom V 508. Mostly Unattributed Recordings (1984, 1990–98); Compilation and Commentary by Louise Byrne. (A Viagem dos Sons / The Journey of Sounds, [8].) Vila Verde, Portugal: Tradisom 1998. Track 19: Mambai, recorded by Louise Byrne, 1997.
T2. Timor: Chants des Éma / Timor: Songs of the Ema. LP. Le Chant du Monde LDX 74693. Recordings (1966, 1969–70) & commentary by Brigitte Clamagirand. (Traditions musicales des cinq continents / Collection du CNRS et du Musée de l’Homme.) Paris: Le Chant du Monde, 1979.
T3. Centre de Recherche en Ethnomusicologie. Sélection (montage): Timor. Unpublished field recordings (1960s) by Louis Berthe and Claudine Friedberg. CNRSMH_I_1973_016.
T4. The Traditional Music of Timor-Leste. 3 DVD. Videos by Ros Dunlop; no commentary. [Rozelle, NSW, Australia]: Tekee Media, [n.d., before 2012].
T5. Dunlop, Ros. Lian husi klama: Músika tradisionál husi Timor-Leste / Sounds of the Soul: The Traditional Music of East Timor. Book with CD and DVD. Recordings & text by Ros Dunlop. Rozelle, NSW, Australia: Tekee Media, 2012.
T6. Music of Timor. CD. Celestial Harmonies 13182–2. Recordings (1990) by Margaret J. Kartomi & H. Kartomi; commentary by Margaret J. Kartomi. Tucson, AZ: Celestial Harmonies, 2000.
T7. Unpublished field recordings in Ataúro, Timor-Leste (2010) by Jen Shyu.
T8. Lopo kami: Dokumentasi persiapan lokakarya Pusat Musik Liturgi Yogyakarta di Camplong, Timor, 2006. DVD. PML 3005. Yogyakarta: Pusat Musik Liturgi, [n.d.].
T9. Indonesia: Songs of Biboki (Western Timor) / Indonésie: Les chants de Biboki (Timor occidental). CD. VDE Gallo CD 1351. Recordings (2006) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. (AIMP [Archives Internationales de Musique Populaire] CII.) Geneva: Musée d’Ethnographie, 2011.
T10. Unpublished field recordings in Lautém, Timor-Leste (2011, 2012) by Philip Yampolsky.
Flores, Solor, Adonara, Lembata
F1. Centre de Recherche en Ethnomusicologie (Nanterre).
F1a. Collection: Indonésie: Flores (Ouest, Centre, Est), 1992. Unpublished field recordings by Dana Rappoport and Joséphine Simonnot. CNRSMH_I_2000_008.
F1b. Collection: Indonésie: Flores Oriental, Solor, Adonara, Lembata, 2006–2007. Unpublished field recordings by Dana Rappoport. CNRSMH_I_2007_006.
F2. Music of Indonesia: Flores. CD. Celestial Harmonies 13175–2. Recordings (1994, 1996) by Margaret J. Kartomi & H. Kartomi; commentary by Margaret J. Kartomi. Tucson, AZ: Celestial Harmonies, 1999.
F3. Tari gawi Lio: Rekaman dokumentasi di suku Lio, Ende Flores NTT. DVD. Filmed in Kampung Tenda, 1998. PML 3006. Yogyakarta: Pusat Musik Liturgi, [n.d.].
F4. Indonésie: Chants des îles de Flores et Solor / Indonesia: Songs from the Islands of Flores and Solor. CD. VDE Gallo CD 1304. Recordings by Dana Rappoport (1992, 2005–6) & Joséphine Simonnot (1992); commentary by Dana Rappoport. (AIMP [Archives Internationales de Musique Populaire] XCV.) Geneva: Musée d’Ethnographie, 2010.
F5. Watublapi: Musik dan lagu tradisional / Traditional music and song: Sanggar Bliran Sina, Flores, Indonesia. CD. Commentary by Pasius Pasing. Desa Kajowair, Kec. Kewapante, Kab. Sikka, Flores: Sanggar Bliran Sina, c 2005.
F6. Flores 1: Vocal and Instrumental Music from East and Central Flores. (Music of Indonesia, 8.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40424. Recordings (1993–94) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1995.
F7. Flores 2: Vocal Music from Central and West Flores. (Music of Indonesia, 9.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40425. Recordings (1993–94) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1995.
Other NTT
NT1. Troubled Grass and Crying Bamboo: The Music of Roti. CD. Indonesian Arts Society IAS 5. Recordings (1992–95) & commentary by Christopher Basile. North Melbourne: Indonesian Arts Society, 1998.
NT2. Unpublished West Pantar videos (Soli-Mele Lego-lego and Del Horang) and audio (Bunni Maggar 1 & 2), recorded by Gary Holton. These will be posted on the website of The Language Archive in Nijmegen, in the collection “Holton_Western_Pantar”:
http://0-hdl-handle-net.catalogue.libraries.london.ac.uk/1839/00-0000-0000-001E-2AFE-B@view
NT3. Various Instruments of Indonesia. CD. King KICW 85177. Recordings (1988–91) by Iida Shigeki; commentary in Japanese with brief English summary. (World Roots Music Library, 136.) Tokyo: King Record Co., 2008. Tracks 14–16: Alor, recorded 1989.
NT4. Musik halus dari alam gersang: Dokumentasi lokakarya PML di Rote-Ndao ’04. DVD. PML 3001. Yogyakarta: Pusat Musik Liturgi, [n.d.].
NT5. Music from the Southeast: Sumbawa, Sumba, Timor. (Music of Indonesia, 16.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SFW 40443. Recordings (1997) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1998.
NT6. Unpublished field recordings in Sumba (1997) by Philip Yampolsky.
Other Insulindia & New Guinea
Maluku
M1. Centre de Recherche en Ethnomusicologie (Nanterre). Collection: Indonésie, musique vocale des Moluques (Tanimbar), 1993. Unpublished field recordings by Joséphine Simonnot & P. Dechamps. CNRSMH_I_2011_001.
M2. Music of Indonesia: Maluku & North Maluku. 2 CD. Celestial Harmonies 14232–2. Recordings (1989–90, 1993) by Margaret J. Kartomi & H. Kartomi; commentary by Margaret J. Kartomi. Tucson, AZ: Celestial Harmonies, 2003.
M3. Unpublished field recordings in Batugoyang, Aru (1990) by Gerard Persoon.
M4. Music of Maluku: Halmahera, Buru, Kei. (Music of Indonesia, 19.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SFW 40446. Recordings (1997) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1999.
Sulawesi
SL1. Indonésie, Toraja: Funérailles et fêtes de fécondité / Indonesia, Toraja: Funerals and Fertility Feasts. CD. CNR 2741004. Recordings (1991–94) & commentary by Dana Rappoport. (Collection C.N.R.S./Musée de l’Homme.) Paris: Le Chant du Monde, 1995.
SL2. Rappoport, Dana. Multimedia Argument / Multimedia Musical Anthology. DVD published as part of Rappoport, Chants de la terre aux trois sangs: musiques rituelles des Toraja de l’île de Sulawesi, Indonésie. 2 vols+DVD-ROM. (Référentiels–Patrimoines Immatériels.) [Paris]: Éditions Épistèmes / Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 2009. English edition, translated by Timothy Seller: Songs from the Thrice-Blooded Land: Ritual Music of the Toraja [same publisher, 2009].
SL3. Sulawesi: Festivals, Funerals, and Work. (Music of Indonesia, 18.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SFW 40445. Recordings (1996–97) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1999.
Borneo
B1. Centre de Recherche en Ethnomusicologie (Nanterre). Collection: Indonésie: Kalimantan ouest 1997. Unpublished field recordings by Dana Rappoport. CNRSMH_I_2011_016.
B2. Bornéo: Musiques des Dayaks et des Punans / Borneo: Music of the Dayak and of the Punan. CD. Buda 92718-2. Recorded in Kalimantan and Sarawak (1997–98) by Manuel Gomes; commentary by Murielle Mignon & Manuel Gomes. Paris: Buda Musique, [n.d.].
B3. The Kenyah of Kalimantan (Indonesia). CD. Musicaphon M 52576. Recordings (1986–88) & commentary by Virginia K. Gorlinski. (An Anthology of South-East Asian Music.) Kassel: Cantate-Musicaphon, 1995.
B4. Music of the Kenyah and Modang in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. LP. Recordings (1977) by I Made Bandem; commentary by José Maceda and Nicole Revel-Macdonald. Quezon City: Department of Music Research, College of Music, University of the Philippines, 1979.
B5. Murut music of North Borneo. LP. Ethnic Folkways Library FE 4459. Recordings & commentary by Ivan Polunin. New York: Folkways Records, 1961.
B6. Sawaku: music of Sarawak. CD. Pan 2067CD. Recordings (1997–98) & commentary by Randy Raine-Reusch. Leiden: Pan Records, 1998.
B7. Kalimantan: Dayak Ritual and Festival Music. (Music of Indonesia, 17.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SFW 40444. Recordings (1995–96) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1998.
Sumatra
SM1. Nias: Epic Songs and Instrumental Music. CD. Pan 2014CD. Recordings (1992) & commentary by Ernst Heins. Leiden: Pan Records, 1994.
SM2. Muslim Music of Indonesia: Aceh and West Sumatra. (Music of Islām, 15.) 2 CD. Celestial Harmonies 14155-2. Recordings (West Sumatra 1972, 1982, 1985; Aceh 1982–83) by Margaret J. Kartomi & H. Kartomi; commentary by Margaret J. Kartomi. Tucson, AZ: Celestial Harmonies, 1998.
SM3. Musiques de l’Islam d’Asie. CD. Inédit W260022. Recorded 1986 and 1990 in Paris; commentary (for Indonesia track only) by Margaret J. Kartomi. Paris: Maison des Cultures du Monde, 1991. Track 6: West Sumatra.
SM4. Songs from the uma: Music from Siberut Island (Mentawai Archipelago), Indonesia. 2 CD. Pan 2111/12. Recordings (1967–95) & commentary by Reimar Schefold and Gerard Persoon. Leiden: Pan Records, 2009.
SM5. Music from Nias and North Sumatra: Hoho, Gendang Karo, Gondang Toba. (Music of Indonesia, 4.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40420. Recordings (1990) by Philip Yampolsky; commentary by Esther L. Siagian, Calvin Dachi, & Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1992.
SM6. Music from the Forests of Riau and Mentawai. (Music of Indonesia, 7.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40423. Recordings (1993–94) by Philip Yampolsky; commentary by Hanefi, Ashley Turner, & Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1995.
SM7. Melayu Music of Sumatra and the Riau Islands: Zapin, mak yong, mendu, ronggeng. (Music of Indonesia, 11.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40427. Recordings (1993–94) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1996.
SM8. Gongs and Vocal Music from Sumatra: Talempong, Didong, Kulintang, Salawat Dulang. (Music of Indonesia, 12.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40428. Recordings (1990–94) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1996.
Other Indonesia (including multi-regional anthologies)
IN1. Jemblung and Related Narrative Traditions of Java. CD. Pan 2048. Recordings (1981, 1983, 1994) & commentary by Jack Body and Yono Sukarno. Leiden: Pan Records, 1997.
IN2. Balaganjur of Pande and Angklung of Sidan, Bali. CD. King KICC 5197. Recordings (1990) by Hoshikawa Kyoji; commentary by Minagawa Koichi. (World Music Library, 97.) Tokyo: King Record Co., 1995. Reissued 2008 as King KICW 85166 (World Roots Music Library, 126.)
IN3. Music of Islamic Festival, Solo. CD. King KICW 85164. Recorded in Surakarta by Hoshikawa Kyoji; commentary in Japanese with English summary by Tamura Fumiko. (World Roots Music Library, 124.) Tokyo: King Record Co., 2008. The ceremonial gamelans were recorded at the Kraton Surakarta.
IN4. Indonesian Music. LP. Columbia KL 210. (Columbia World Library of Folk and Primitive Music, 7.) Compilation and commentary by Jaap Kunst. Tracks 13 & 14: Maluku.
IN5. Gamelan of Central Java, II: Ceremonial Music. CD. Felmay TY 8042. Recordings (Surakarta, 2001) & commentary by John Noise Manis [=Giovanni Sciarrino]. San Germano, Italy: Felmay, 2002. The ceremonial gamelans were recorded at the Mangkunegaran.
IN6. Musik tradisi Nusantara / Traditional music of the Archipelago. 4 vols. CD. Recordings & commentary by Sri Hastanto. Jakarta: Proyek Pengembangan Media Kebudayaan, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1997–99.
IN7. Lombok, Kalimantan, Banyumas: Little-Known Forms of Gamelan and Wayang. (Music of Indonesia, 14.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40441. Recordings (1996) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1997.
IN8. Indonesian Guitars. (Music of Indonesia, 20.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SFW 40447. Recordings (1990–97) & commentary by Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1999. Track 11: Sumba, recorded 1997.
Indonesian Papua & Papua New Guinea
P1. Music of Biak, Irian Jaya: Wor, Church Songs, Yospan. (Music of Indonesia, 10.) CD. Smithsonian Folkways SF 40426. Recordings (1993–94) by Philip Yampolsky; commentary by Danilyn Rutherford & Philip Yampolsky. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Folkways Recordings, 1996.
PNG1. Admiralty Islands: Papua New Guinea: Bipi, Manus. CD. Philips 472.507-2. Recordings (1974) & commentary by Charles Duvelle. (Prophet 35.) 2003.
PNG2. Music from South New Guinea. LP. Asch AHM 4216. Recordings (1963–64) & commentary by Wolfgang Laade. New York: Asch Records, 1971.
PNG3. Selected Audio Examples. CD accompanying Adrienne L. Kaeppler and J. W. Love, eds., The Garland Encyclopedia of World Music, vol. 9: Australia and the Pacific Islands. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998.
Haut de page
Notes
For the purposes of this article and this special issue of Archipel, “Insulindia” is Island Southeast Asia, with the ad hoc exception of the Philippines and New Guinea. It includes all of the islands belonging to the modern nation of Indonesia, plus the whole of two islands, Borneo and Timor, that are shared between Indonesia and other nations. For eastern Insulindia, I will use a narrow definition to suit the region where my data are most abundant: for this article, it is the Indonesian province of Nusa Tenggara Timur, plus the half of Timor belonging to the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. This region, which I abbreviate as NTT/TL, includes the islands of Sumba, Flores, Adonara, Solor, Lembata, Pantar, Alor, Savu, Rote, and Timor, along with other, smaller islands. A broader definition of “eastern” would include Maluku as well, but the data I have—admittedly less extensive than those for NTT/TL—suggest that music there does not have the same configuration of traits that I find in NTT/TL. This contrast will be apparent in the discussion below and particularly in the summary table (Fig. 10).
Triple meter and the “tritone melos.” See the discussion under “tritones,” below.
Thus, music in European harmonized idioms or in Middle-Eastern idioms is excluded from the traditional category. Note that I do not propose traditional instruments as a criterion of tradition: traditional music can be played on imported instruments (depending on the music and the instrument). Also, I do not assume that all music using the interval of the third, so crucial to Euro-American standard harmony, is non-traditional. It is the use of the system of tonic-dominant harmony (necessarily involving thirds) that marks a music as, in my terms, non-traditional. Finally, it should go without saying that I am not disparaging music that is not traditional, nor music mixing the traditional and the foreign. I simply maintain that the distinctive features in the music of eastern Insulindia are to be sought in traditional music.
These observations are particularly true for Maluku. Twenty years ago, Margaret Kartomi published an article titled “Is Maluku still musicological terra incognita?” Despite her efforts and my own and those of a handful of other researchers, I believe it largely still is, at least at the level of detail that is needed.
For precise definitions of these technical terms, see Arom et al., 2007. I provide loose working definitions here. Unison means that everyone sings the same pitches at the same time; by convention, singing in octaves (as when men and women sing the same melody together in their typical registers) is classed as unison. Heterophony is when everyone sings approximately the same melody at approximately the same time. (Imagine a group of people sitting around at a campfire or a party, relaxing and singing a well-known tune. Not everyone sings it in the same way, and some people can barely sing in tune or in time—yet no one is expelled for “singing it wrong.” That’s heterophony.) Harmony here means any pitch other than a unison or octave that is intentionally sung simultaneously with another pitch; it does not mean only the harmonies regularly heard in “common practice” tonal music. Homorhythm is the use of harmony (in the not-specifically-tonal sense) as the predominant texture in a song or a section of a song, with all parts or harmonic lines moving mainly in synchrony. (Minor rhythmic discrepancies and subdivisions are encompassed within homorhythm, but if the parts move with rhythmic independence, it is counterpoint, not homorhythm.) Because of the criterion of simultaneity in the definition of harmony, all harmony is essentially homorhythmic. The lines between various kinds of homorhythm or harmony are sometimes subjective, and I have not tried to distinguish them rigorously. There is occasional or sporadic harmony, sounded without consistency in what is essentially a heterophonic texture; there is selective harmony, where certain tones in a melody are usually given a harmony, but most others are left unadorned; and there is pervasive harmony. The important distinction for this article is between occasional harmony (momentary homorhythm), and the extensive homorhythm characterizing a whole song or song segment.
When the opposition is between a small group and a chorus, the distinction between antiphonal and responsorial singing is, like that between sporadic and pervasive harmony in the previous footnote, subjective, having to do with the relative “weight” of the small group’s part vis-à-vis the larger group’s. If the two groups’ contributions have more or less equal weight, I would call the texture antiphonal.
Some definitions restrict antiphony to the direct repetition by one chorus of what the other chorus sang. In that schema, all antiphony is of my second or iterative type, and what I call contrastive antiphony would then be considered responsorial. But that construction obscures both the social dimension I wish to signal, and the musical similarity of antiphonal and responsorial forms of iterative singing.
Timor: NT5 trs 10, 11, 12 and T3 _001_02 (Bunaq); T1 tr 19 (Mambai); T2 trs A1, A3, A4 (Ema); T5 tr 19 (unidentified group in Timor-Leste); T8 tr 3 (unidentified group recorded in Atambua); T9 trs 4, 5, 7, 12, 15 (Biboki). Western Flores: F1a _003_07; F2 tr 1 (>4:35), 16; F7 tr 10 (opening).
Pantar: NT2, Bunni Maggar 1.
Aru: M3 tr 4 (11:51). Sumbawa: IN5 vol 1 tr 5. Toraja: SL2 (Rising sun: bugi’), and SL3 tr 5; NTT (Lio, Flores): F3 tr 2 between 8:30 and 9:45. A special kind of iterative antiphony can occur in music for the Toraja funerary round-dance badong (SL1 trs 5, 7, 8; and SL2 [Setting sun: badong], where it is discussed at length, with audio examples and graphic analysis). Two or four small groups of soloists, with only a few singers in each, may sing antiphonally, their passages interspersed with singing by a full chorus. It is the soloist groups that are in antiphony, not the chorus. I may add that the serial duets of Flores and Timor, discussed below, can be seen as instances of iterative antiphony, but they are not instances of group singing, which is the main topic here.
Virginia Gorlinski confirms (p. c., 2015) that she too did not encounter antiphonal singing during her years of research in central and eastern Borneo, and Patricia Matusky makes the same statement (p. c., 2015) regarding her research in Malaysian Borneo. Both researchers remark that responsorial singing is common in those regions.
Th. Pigeaud, in his exhaustive 1938 work on Javanese folk performances, remarks that “round dances and their songs [rei-dansen en –zangen] by girls and women . . . on the occasion of annual village feasts and the like” do exist but he is not going to deal with them, as they have not been developed into paid performances (ontwikkeld tot vertoningen die men tegen beloning last opvoeren) (Pigeaud 1938:245). It is not clear why he specifies that the dancers and singers he will not discuss are female. It seems unlikely that men were excluded from village celebrations.
I take this term from Jack Body’s album notes for his excellent jemblung CD, IN1.
T2 (Ema) trs A1, A3, A4 (in all of these the female chorus is more restrained than the male); T3 item _002_08 (Bunaq); T5 tr 36 (Ataúro); T9 (Biboki) trs 2, 11.
IN1 trs 7 (Madura), 8 (Pekalongan).
IN6 vol 3 tr 15 (dikir baru).
The force of “traditional” in this formulation is to exclude from the discussion singing in European popular-music or church-music idioms, which are typically harmonized according to the conventions of European standard-practice harmony. These forms of non-unison singing are found all over Insulindia.
See Yampolsky 2001a (or its online posting) for description of these complexes. Readers familiar with Central Javanese gamelan music may object that the female singer (pesindhen) and the male chorus (gerong) are not in unison with each other. This is true, but I would reply that (a) the gerong itself is in unison, and (b) the male and female singers are not engaged in group singing in the way that men and women at a round dance are. The chorus and the soloist contribute distinct vocal strands to an ensemble that encompasses singing not as the principal musical element but as one component among many.
Arom et al. 2007 define polyphony as plurilineality: anything that is not in unison or octaves (see footnote 6 above). Note that antiphony is not necessarily polyphonic: it is monophonic if the opposing choruses are themselves in unison and do not overlap on different pitches.
F7 tr 3 (Nage). Other complex singing groups from central Flores are heard in F7 trs 1 and 2 (Nage) and 4–8 (Ngada). Though I have not analyzed scales in eastern Insulindia and am not proposing some general uniqueness or exceptional character in them, I have to point out the extraordinary scale of the song in Fig. 2, with three semitones crammed into the ambitus of a diminished fifth.
F6 tr 5 (Sikka).
F5 trs 1 and 3, F6 tr 2 (all Sikka).
In addition to the drone shown in Fig. 2 (an excerpt from the second song in F7 tr 3), drones are also heard in parts of the first song in that track, as well as in F7 trs 1, 2, 4, 5, and F6 trs 5 and 12 (shifting drone), all from Nage and Ngada people in central Flores. There is a pulsing drone under a solo in F3 (Lio) >17:46. A syllabic drone is heard in F4 tr 22 from Solor. As for Timor, apart from the duets, there is an intermittent drone in T2 tr B7. José Maceda (1986: 14), citing the same LP of Ema music (T2), mentions drones in Timor, but his description indicates that he means monotone responses in a call-and-response framework. (Examples of such monotones are T2 trs A2, B6, B8, and B9.) These may, of course, be considered drones, but not in the sense I (and Arom) give to the term: since there is nothing going on melodically at the same time as the monotone responses, there is no plurilinearity, and the monotones therefore do not come into this discussion.
NT1 tr 11 (Rote).
M1 item _005_05 (Tanimbar).
SL1 (Toraja) trs 3, 4, 11–16. Note that these drones (and also some of those from Flores heard on F7, including the one in Fig. 2) are positioned in the middle of the music’s range, or near the top. Arom stipulates, too narrowly, that drones are at the bottom: “the term drone [bourdon] designates one or several sustained tones... that serve as foundation for one or several melodies proceeding simultaneously above it” (2007: 1092).
Timor: T1 tr 19 (Mambai); T3 items _001_03 and _04 (Bunaq); T9 trs 9, 15 (Biboki); NT5 trs 8 (Tetun), 10 &12 (Bunaq). Flores: F3 >3:10 (Lio); F7 tr 9 (>2:52; danding inserted in mbata, with selective fifths; Manggarai). Rote: NT4 index 9. Adonara: F1b item _001_013.
T9 tr 17 (Biboki). During this recording session, the same singers sang this song in two other ways—parallel fifths and unison—before settling on fourths.
F3 >9:45 (Lio); F6 trs 12–14 (Toto region, central Flores; population originally from Lio).
F6 trs 5 (Sikka) and 12, 13 (Toto); F7 tr 5 (Nage).
Aru: M3. Kei: M4 tr 12 (ngel-ngel, thirds). North Sulawesi (Minahasa): SL3 tr 10 and 12 (Tombulu mazani, in fourths and thirds, respectively), 13 (Tontemboan maengket, thirds). South Sulawesi: SL1 tr 2 (Toraja, thirds). West Kalimantan: B7 tr 12 (Kayan Mendalam, fourths), 24 (Ot Danum, fourths).
Borneo: B3 trs 1, 9 and B7 tr 1 (Kenyah). Sulawesi: SL3 trs 9, 11 (mazani, Tombulu).
M1 item _001_10 (Tanimbar). The transcription in Fig. 4 has been transposed down a half-step for convenience, and the description here matches the transcription. Several songs in the M1 collection follow the harmonic scheme shown in Fig. 4.
Arom et al. divide homorhythm into two categories only: parallel and divergent (2007:1094).
Tetun: NT5 tr 9. Lio: F3 >24:15. Oblique motion can also be heard in some cadences of F7 tr 4 (Nage, Flores).
This would seem to be by definition heterophony, yet it is also consistently homorhythmic. I do not know of comparable practices in NTT/TL. The instance I describe here is more extreme than the sape’ duets found in published CDs. Unfortunately, I cannot give a traceable citation of the recording I am describing: it was posted on Facebook, by someone who had received it directly from one of the performers. It is a duet identified as Sampik Lepo’ Timai, played by two musicians from Sarawak, Solomon Gau and Jimpau Balan.
Arom, p. c., 2015. In that case, I would propose also homorhythm with contrapuntal tendencies, which would cover what I feel is the quasi-contrapuntal nature of Fig. 5 and 6.
F7 tr 8, recorded 1993. The description here is based on this 1993 recording. F1a item _003_02 is another version of Goegoe, recorded in the same village (Kampung Wogo, Kabupaten Ngada) in 1992; cf. also F1a _003_01, an unspecified dance song with the same construction.
NT3 tr 16 (Takpala, Alor). Also F3 >8:00 and >9:45 (Lio), and F6 tr 1 >3:24 (Sikka). The Sikka soloist exploits oblique motion against held tones in the chorus.
SM5 trs 3, 4, 5 (Hilisimaetanö, Nias).
F7 tr 10 (Rongga, Manggarai).
SL3 tr 6 (Uma-speakers, Pipikoro region, Central Sulawesi).
I call the duets serial because they are sung in strophic alternation by two or more pairs of singers. In Timor, a common performance pattern is as follows: each strophe contains one line of a two-line poem. Each line is stated by one duo and repeated by another; thus one poem is complete in four statements of the melody (if only two duos are taking part). More duos means more repetitions of each line. The pattern in Flores is different (Rappoport 2010:239).
“Sought” here alludes to the phenomenon of “seeking seconds” that has been identified as a characteristic of duet singing in the Shop region of Bulgaria. Timothy Rice introduced the English phrase in his dissertation (1977: 15), attributing it (in its original Bulgarian form) to the Bulgarian musicologist Nikolaj Kaufman. Donna Buchanan (p. c., 2015) has collegially tracked down and translated for me a passage in Kaufman’s writings that clarifies his use of the term: “For Shop diaphony, harmonic combinations at the interval of the second are especially characteristic. The singers even ‘seek’ to obtain seconds . . . . The ‘seeking’ of seconds of this type most often occurs in the following manner: when the melody of the first voice moves above the tonic, the second voice sings the drone pitch on the tonic. When, however, the first voice descends to the tonic, a second voice descends to the subtonic pitch. This ‘evasion’ of the unison occurs in different ways—sometimes simultaneously, but sometimes not simultaneously, so as to obtain interesting diaphonic moves [or progressions]. . . .” (Kaufman 1967 [etc.], trans. from Bulgarian by Donna Buchanan; the Bulgarian equivalents of “seek” and “seeking” are in quotation marks in Kaufman’s text). “Seeking seconds” is pervasive in both the Flores and Timor duets. For example, in Fig. 8, in the last three measures of the first and third systems, the two voices reach a unison and then the upper voice stays steady while the other drops—in oblique motion—to a second below. Dana Rappoport has also remarked “seeking seconds” in the dondi’ funeral repertoire of Toraja in Sulawesi (2000: 244; SL2 [Setting Sun: dondi’]).
Dana Rappoport has published recordings of the Flores styles on F4, and a few are heard on my F6. I have not yet published recordings from my ongoing research on the Timor-Leste vaihoho duets (T10). For Flores, F4 trs 5 and 12 exemplify a more contrapuntal style; F4 trs 3, 6, 7, and F6 tr 7 mix counterpoint and homorhythm; F4 trs 2 and 8 and F6 tr 6 are mainly homorhythmic; and F4 trs 1 and 20 have melody with shifting, intermittent drone.
An excerpt from F4 tr 6 is transcribed in Rappoport 2010: 243, and one from F4 tr 7 in Rappoport 2011: 141. The vaihoho strophe in Fig. 8 of the present paper is transcribed from T10 12Y11M08 T08.
PNG1, PNG3.
SM2 disc 1 tr 17, SM3 tr 6, SM8 tr 12.
Timor: NT5 (Tetun) tr 9 (see Fig. 5); NT5 (Bunaq) trs 10 & 12; T1 (Mambai) tr 19; T3 item _001_03 (Bunaq), T3 item _002_04 (women only), T3 item _002_07; T4 trs 4 (recorded in Hatubuilico), 17a (recorded in Venilale); T6 (Meto?) tr 16. Flores: F1a item _004_09 & _10 (mbata, Manggarai); F3 09:45, 24:15, etc. (gawi dance songs, Lio); F4 tr 16 (Tana ‘Ai); F6 tr 3 (Sikka; this is in twelve, with four main beats subdivided in three).
North Sulawesi: SL3 tr 12, a Tombulu (Minahasa) mazani song (though this may be the result of church influence). South Sulawesi (Toraja): SL2 (Rising Sun: bugi’, southern style). West Kalimantan: B7 tr 12 (Kayan Mendalam).
When I describe gamelan music, I am referring to the traditional repertoire, not to modern, deliberately innovative compositions. A teacher of mine in Yogyakarta in the early 1980s wanted to enter a competition for new compositions. A key criterion for selection was that the composition include a technique or feature not found in traditional Javanese music. If this is the criterion for new composition, then it becomes impossible to generalize about the idiom without distinguishing between traditional and modern.
SM7 trs 14 (Riau) and 17 (North Sumatra). See David Goldsworthy’s discussion (1979:319–51). Lagu dua is one of the three categories of ronggeng melodies, all of which are dance tunes. Lagu dua tunes are played at fast tempo. Goldsworthy says they are in “simple triple metre (3/4) or a combination of simple triple and compound duple metre (3/4 [and] 6/8)” (340). An example is B6 tr 21. The other two categories, senandung (slow tempo) and mak inang (medium), are in duple meter. Goldsworthy regards the entire genre of ronggeng music as “post-Portuguese.” In particular, he remarks of the dance in triple meter: “Some Portuguese-like dance movements are found in lagu dua dances, such as hopping up and down on the spot with the left hand on the hip and the right hand on the shoulder” (340). The singers who recorded SM7 tr 14 for me did a dance when the tempo sped up and became unsingable: facing each other, each stood on the right leg and extended the left leg until their feet touched; then they switched legs. This also seems European rather than Indonesian in spirit.
Nias: SM1 tr 16; SM5 tr 6, second song (>2:15). Marlene Patton analyzes a number of other hoho in her M.A. thesis (1987). In the corpus of four hoho she analyzes in great detail, she describes the main sections (“body”) of two as being in 6/8 and one in 6/4. Siberut: SM4 disc 1 tr 1, disc 2 tr 7; SM6 tr 16.
The music called senggayung (B7 trs 5-8), played by people along the Upper Jelai River in the interior of West Kalimantan, is a separate case, with no counterpart I know of elsewhere in Insulindia. Here, instead of a consistent complex meter played throughout, we hear spectacular heterometer—seemingly random sequences of fives, sevens, ones, elevens, etc. It is impossible to detect an ostinato or assign a single meter to the sequence, but it is clearly not random, since in performance the sequence is played through once and then repeated note-for-note. A transcription of one of these pieces appears in Yampolsky 2001b (Fig. 3a and 3b).
Sikka: F5 trs 4 & 7 (3+2+2), tr 1 (3+4); F6 tr 3 >7:31 (3+2+2). Larantuka, East Flores: F1b item _001_050. Manggarai: F1a item _004_09 & _10.
Sumba: IN8 tr 11. Ataúro: T5 tr 36 from 3:02 (but by 5:30 it seems to have slid into a straight duple, one two three rest).
Benuaq 14 beat ostinato: B7 tr 13. Tunjung 13-beat ostinato: B2 tr 17. Benuaq 30-beat ostinato: B2 tr 5. Ot Danum timang: B7 tr 19. Kanayatn: B7 tr 10. With regard to the ostinati and beat-cycles I present throughout this article: I start them where I can grasp them. I did not discuss with the performers (those I recorded myself) where they felt the repeating patterns began. Thus what I show as a grouping in the order a+b+c, they might feel as starting with b or with c.
In Javanese music, these units are called gatra. “The gatra is the smallest melodic/rhythmic unit of a gendhing [gamelan composition], consisting of four balungan [skeletal melody] beats” (Supanggah 2011:176).
The three videos from Timor discussed in this paragraph are, in order: T4 disc 3, “Tebe Dai Tilomar” (19-beat melody); T4 disc 2, “Tebe Dai Lian Midiki,” second song (22-beat melody); and T4 disc 2, “Tebe Dai Loi Nona,” (32- or 36-beat melody). Dana Rappoport (p. c., 2015) observes that “Nama Nigi” in eastern Flores (F4 tr 11) is called “the difficult dance” because it too has a dance step out of phase with the sung melody.
Lembata: unpublished video by Dana Rappoport, made in Ds. Balurebong on 1 July 2007.
The three examples in this sentence are, in order: B2 tr 2 (Meratus Mountains, South Kalimantan); B5 tr B1 (Murut, Sabah); M4 tr 13 (ngel-ngel, Kei Besar).
Neither form of discoordination is found, apparently, in Java, Bali, and Sumatra. In a gamelan or other percussion ensemble, where precision and synchrony are central values, straying from the prevailing pulse or going out of phase with other instruments would be a glaring error and bring shame on the performer—except in the cases where a melodic line (e.g., that of the female singer, the flute, and sometimes the rebab in Central Javanese gamelan) is meant to be in free meter as a contrast to the fixed meter of the other instruments.
Album notes to PNG2. The instances Laade speaks of are heard in PNG2 trs A11 and A12, respectively. Cf. P1 tr 11 from Biak, which may be another, less extreme instance.
For my purposes here I will define a second as any interval significantly larger than a unison and smaller than a minor third—thus, say, above 80 and below 240 cents.
B7 trs 17–24 (timang, Ot Danum).
SM2 disc 1 tr 18 (salawat dulang, Minangkabau). In this recording, two singers sing the same melody heterophonically several times, always ending together on a second. Here, however, the seconds seem an incidental product of the heterophony: as we can tell from moments when each singer sings alone before recombining in duet, the singers have differing ideas of how the melody should end. One always ends on C, and the other always ends by singing that C and then descending to Bb. When they sing together, they end up in a second.
Kunst 1942: 35-37; cf. Kunst 1939: 7-9. Although the principal field research for both Music in Nias (1939) and Music in Flores (1942) was conducted in 1930 (April for Nias, seven weeks in July and August for Flores), Kunst does not mention his Flores findings in the Nias book. There, without mentioning Lio, he cites F. M. Schnitger: “In spite of the differences which exist between the Nagas and the people of Nias, the similarities between their megalith cultures are so striking and so numerous that there can be no doubt of their relation. They must at one time have had a common land of origin and this can have been nowhere but in the valley of the Irrawady” (Schnitger 1939: 163, quoted in Kunst 1939: 7; emphasis in the original). In Music in Flores he discusses Lio, Nias, and Naga together but omits Schnitger’s theory that Nias culture originated in Burma. In a recent article, Roger Blench notes that “genetic study of the Y chromosomes in the populations of Nias” shows that the island was “apparently settled by a small number of genetically uniform males from the Taiwan Straits area,” who wiped out the prior inhabitants (Blench 2012: 130).
Tritones and triple meter together: F3 >38:10 (Lio), SM5 tr 4 (Nias). Tritones without triple meter: F3 >07:55 (Lio), SM1 tr 2 and SM5 trs 3 and 5 (Nias). Triple meter without tritones: F3 >08:28, >24:15 (Lio), SM5 tr 6 >02:15 (Nias).
Ataúro: T4 disc 1 title 14 (Makadade), T5 tr 36, T7 #100716. Manggarai: F2 tr 17. Sumba: NT6 #SB 97-3 tr 8.
SL1 tr 20 is a Toraja flute melody using the tritone.
The ideas and some of the wording in this paragraph are borrowed from Yampolsky 2001a, and in the next paragraph from my album notes to NT5. For a detailed presentation of the argument concerning gamelan and gong ensembles, see the album notes to IN7 and the supplementary note posted at http://media.smithsonianfolkways.org/liner_notes/smithsonian_folkways/SFW40441.pdf.
These are found in several parts of northern and eastern Borneo, and also in Lembata.
Indeed, the gamelan of Java and Bali and their outposts in South Kalimantan, southern Sumatra, and Lombok are highly elaborated forms of melodic gong ensembles, with the melodic role assignable to instruments other than the gong-row.
F1b items _001_104, from Lembata, and _001_357, from eastern Flores, are exceptions. T6 tr 4 may be another, or it may be better classed as an in-between form. It is not clearly described in the album notes, but it sounds as though it is six kettle-gongs laid in a rack, plus drums. One player plays a melody on the three lower-pitched gongs, and another plays an ostinato countermelody on the upper three gongs. There is no hocket. The musicians in this recording are Sumbanese long resident in Timor.
The gongs may also be laid in a rack, thus resembling the gong row of melodic gong ensembles. However, if one player controls only a few of the gongs while another player controls another few, as in NT4 tr 1, and there is no foregrounded melody, an ensemble with gongs in a row may still be considered non-melodic.
Timor: NT5 tr 7 and T8 trs 2, 4, 5, 14 (Meto); T6 tr 9 (Tetun?); T8 trs 9, 10 (Amarasi); T8 tr 18 (Helong in Semau). Rote: NT1 trs 3, 4, 7, 8 and NT4 tr 1, 8, 10. Flores: F5 trs 4, 6, 8, and F6 tr 4 (Sikka). Lembata: F1b item _001_108. Alor: NT3 trs 14, 15. Sumba: NT5 trs 5, 6.
North Maluku: M2 disc 2, trs 15, 16 (cikamomo from Ternate). Borneo: B4 tr II-2 (Modang, East Kalimantan) and B5 tr B6 (Murut, Sabah).
SM8 trs 1, 2 (talempong pacik, Minangkabau, West Sumatra). Pacik means “hand-held.”
IN2 trs 1, 2 (Bali).
IN6 vol 2 tr 26 (mislabeled 27 in booklet and track list; Gonakn Sipat, Pompakng).
Maluku and North Maluku: M2 disc 1, tr 20 and IN4 tr 14 (Ambon); IN4 tr 13 (Banda); M4 tr 7 (Buru). Sulawesi: SL3 trs 7, 8 (Mongondow). Borneo: B1 item _002_06 (Taman); B2 trs 5, 6, 10 and B7 trs 13, 14, 15 (Benuaq); B2 tr 17 (Tunjung); B7 trs 2, 3, 4 (Upper Jelai); B7 tr 9 and IN6 vol 2 tr 26 (Pompakng); B7 tr 16 (Dusun Deyah). Sumatra: SM8 trs 3, 4 (Minangkabau); SM8 trs 8–11 (Melinting, Lampung); IN6 vol 2 tr 15 (Jambi); IN6 vol 2 tr 12 and vol 3 tr 11 (Rejang Lebong, Bengkulu). Melodic gong ensembles in South Sumatra are discussed by Kartomi (2012: chapter 7, with online audio), and I have heard them in Natuna (Kepulauan Riau). In Java, most ensembles are full gamelan, but the three famous archaic or ceremonial ensembles, Monggang, Kodhok Ngorek, and Carabalen (IN3 trs 1, 2, 3, and IN5 trs 3 4, 5), are all, in my analytical scheme, melodic gong ensembles rather than gamelan, and this is also the case for Balinese balaganjur (IN2 trs 1, 2), as explained above.
F2 tr 14 and F1a item _004_02 (Manggarai); F1b item _001_357 (eastern Flores).
SM8 trs 2 (talempong pacik); SM8 trs 3, 4 (talempong Unggan).
There are all- or mostly female gamelan groups in Central Java and Bali (gamelan ibu-ibu), but these became widespread only in the second half of the twentieth century and do not reflect the traditional social organization of gamelan, whereas the female role in percussion ensembles in the places I have cited in this paragraph (other than Java and Bali and perhaps talempong pacik) seems to be longstanding.
It is striking that the long line of gong-chime ensembles running from the mainland down to Sumatra and eastward through the archipelago stops short at the Atoni Pah Meto in western (Indonesian) Timor. The Meto have leku sene, five or six suspended gongs and a drum (NT5 tr 7), but aside from the westernmost groups of Tetun-speakers in Indonesia, who live right next to the Meto, none of the Timorese peoples east of the Meto have gong chimes. At most they have a single gong (Tetun: tala) that plays in rhythmic unison with a monorhythmic drum ensemble (as in the likurai or tebedai dance). This abrupt halt to the line of gong chimes suggests a musical fault line in central Timor, where Austronesian and non-Austronesian music cultures meet.
Haut de page